I Sindaci: “Attacchi interessati alla sanità”? Si, siamo d’accordo anche noi, ma noi l’interesse lo vediamo in chi ha portato nella sanità il lucro. In chi utilizza soldi public benefit,
want them to be more cooperative structured as private companies, want to be even more powerful non-profit organization or a private individual pieces that take advantage of the gaps that inevitably are created and that data in hand, very often cost more. mayors are wrong to attack those who try to make it clear that there are different interests at this moment in its regional headquarters, but also the opposition that is watching is no different than the structure of services that meet the needs of citizens.
Increase the use of private, increase cuts and reorganizations, but decrease performance and increase expenses.
Please read the auditors report Censis 2009 on the social situation of the country in the section on health:
"almost 40% of respondents from low socio-economic withdrew for economic reasons, health care, and is slightly lower (37.8%) has reduced the proportion of those who buy drugs for a fee. For the poor remains the only welfare that often, however, requires a financial outlay: 51.9% of respondents in the low and 42.8% of those who autocolloca to an intermediate level are resigned to the length of the lists of 'Waiting can not afford access to private health care is often required to access the performance in a short time. "
mayors that are wrong, instead of giving battle to maintain services at levels worthy of A-class citizens, they erect a wall against those who seek to be an incontrovertible reality and provides indisputable data on which, however, and deliberately, nor does it grant the discussion.
What they say about 600 employees in less'? They say the hundreds of beds less?
How can anyone believe the regional plan when, for example, the operation of orthopedics at Sarzana can not be implemented because La Spezia ask staff for 24 hours on call for the DEA to level 2 and the primary Pensioner? How conceivable that we can make a big election when they could stay orthopedics only five orthopedic surgeons, however, not all eligible for a full division which should return home in the patients who go outside? It is not true that the doctors and Towers Bottai chose to retire: they were forced. Why delete a primary Orthopaedics whether the project is a great Traumatology with Trauma Center in La Spezia and a great Orthopedic Hospital of Sarzana? Throughout the world there are two different primary specialize in a single branch.
And what about the 35 granted assumptions for 2010 (still a long way to arrive, and we are already in 2011) in terms of staff that the ASL has lost five since 2004, amounting about 40% of all regional reduction?
Or maybe they are right when they say that the surrounding areas from health point of view we are "finished" in the region because our politicians do not count for anything?
Here ... Yeah ... maybe we are concerned the attacks. But please dear auditors, look for them elsewhere and open your eyes. And our mayor to remember that if the Caleo Spezia may launch a "birth path," which, however, does not mean that counseling revive shall continue to be woefully empty, it owes to 6,000 signatures, to the membership and the 3500 mobilization of citizens this summer. Citizens who should be the if only his best friends were accepted and heard.
The Executive.
0 comments:
Post a Comment